![]() The bottom line is this, though: there isn't really an alternative. ![]() I just wish they had done a slightly more professional job. This release has left me conflicted because all of these new things sound like good ideas and I WANT to like Lightroom. I have a nVidia GTX 780m, a very good card, and yet Lightroom is SLOWER with it enabled than without. Perhaps it can, but it doesn't seem to work with mine. ![]() Several other features feel very flaky and unpolished - like flagging and unflagging which sometimes just doesn't do anything.įinally, there's the promise that LR6 can use your graphics card. Restarting Lightroom fixes this but it is a pain. ![]() The Crop tool in the Develop module often breaks, for me, replacing the image of the picture with a blue rectangle with white lines. Some features, like the Grid, are the same. I have never experienced one that is quite as slow as Lightroom's.)Įveryone keeps repeating Adobe's statement that LR6 is "faster" but, in my experience, it isn't. This makes some improvements useless - for example, it doesn't matter whether the software supports modification of a graduated filter if the brush tool is too slow to use! (I've been using brush tools since Paint, and in Photoshop since Photoshop 5 on a 166 MHz Pentium. I find LR6 to be incredibly slow, even compared to LR5 which was already slow. ![]() Yes, both features are missing options and could have been done better - a lot better - but they work for the majority of cases. stitching and HDR into Lightroom was a good move and the fact that it stitches RAW files into DNG format is brilliant and unique. I read the review and also have tried out Lightroom 6. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |